If the rumors are true, then the recent decision by the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) to reappoint Augustine Eguavoen as the temporary head coach of the Men’s senior national team, the Super Eagles, has sparked considerable debate and skepticism. While some might argue in favor of his return, the majority view this move as a regressive step that raises significant concerns about the direction of Nigerian football.
Eguavoen’s past stint as the head coach of the Super Eagles, particularly his exit following the failure to qualify for the 2022 FIFA World Cup, remains a vivid memory for Nigerian football enthusiasts. His inability to secure a spot for Nigeria in the global football showcase was an undeniable disappointment, and his subsequent resignation underscored the gravity of the situation.
The decision to appoint Eguavoen seems to overlook his track record. Criticisms point to the underwhelming results during his previous tenures, which include a 2003 under-17 World Cup group stage exit, a third-place finish in the African Cup of Nations (Afcon) 2006, a group stage exit in the 2012 Olympic qualifiers, and most notably, his inability to lead the Super Eagles to the World Cup in Qatar 2022, losing the qualification spot to Ghana. These failures highlight a consistent pattern of shortcomings that cannot be ignored.
READ ALSO: The Contenders: 2022-23 UEFA Women’s Player of the Year Nominees
Many voices have raised concerns about the circumstances under which Eguavoen’s appointment is being made. Some believe that he might be the only one willing to accept and work under what is perceived as the NFF’s questionable contract terms. This raises suspicions about the transparency and integrity of the hiring process. It’s a sentiment that adds to the growing frustration about the lack of professionalism and accountability within the football administration.
Furthermore, the timing of Eguavoen’s return is questionable. With the African Cup of Nations just five months away, Nigeria finds itself without a coach to lead the team in one of the continent’s most prestigious tournaments. This not only reflects poorly on the NFF’s planning but also sends a message of instability to the players and the football community at large.
The argument against Eguavoen’s return is grounded in the idea of progression and development. In an era where football is advancing rapidly, Nigeria cannot afford to recycle coaches with a history of mediocrity. The nation possesses a pool of talented coaches, both locally and internationally, who have proven their mettle and could bring a fresh perspective and innovative tactics to the team.
Nigerian football enthusiasts are right to question this decision. It’s a reality that a coach with multiple past failures is unlikely to miraculously transform into a success story. The appointment of Eguavoen might just perpetuate the cycle of underachievement and missed opportunities that have plagued Nigerian football for years.
In conclusion, the NFF’s choice to temporarily appoint Augustine Eguavoen as the head coach of the Super Eagles raises concerns about the federation’s lack of a coherent strategy for advancement. The decision to bring back a coach with a history of underperformance and to overlook potential candidates who could invigorate Nigerian football is puzzling. It’s time for the NFF to prioritize competence, professionalism, and long-term vision over short-term fixes that do little to address the underlying issues in the system. The path to success demands a break from the past and a commitment to a brighter footballing future.
